Citation
a écrit:
An immigration tribunal had to be stopped after a lawyer twice refused a judge's request that she remove her veil.
Shabnam Mughal appeared at the tribunal dressed head-to-foot in black and wearing a fullface veil with just her eyes showing.
She was representing a Sikh businessman appealing against the Home Office's refusal to grant his nephew permission to visit the UK.
Now another judge, Sir Henry Hodge, head of the Asylum and Immigrations Tribunals, will rule on what should happen next in the case.
At the original hearing tribunal chairman George Glossop asked her to remove the veil during the tribunal hearing in Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire. She refused and the case was adjourned until the afternoon.
When the case was reconvened Judge Glossop said: "I am not very happy that you are appearing in a veil. Would you kindly remove it to assist with communications?
"It will allow me to see your face and I cannot hear you as well as I would like."
Miss Mughal, who is in her twenties, replied: "Sir, we have been through this issue." She then announced: "Sir, I am taking my leave."
She returned to the court as Judge Glossop was talking to Mr Singh. On seeing her enter he asked Miss Mughal: "Do you wish to carry on?" She replied: "No, I just want to listen to what is being said."
Judge Glossop continued: "If you remove your veil, which happens in other courts, we can proceed, otherwise I am going to have consultations with the President of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal. Will you remove it?"
Miss Mughal responded: "You are clearly aware of my position on the grounds of my religious beliefs. I won't."
The dispute follows the case of Muslim teaching assistant Aishah Azmi who was suspended from her job at Headfield Church of England Junior School in Dewsbury, West Yorkshire, after refusing to remove her veil.
Citation
Obs2006 a écrit:
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2006/11/veilAP_228x228.jpg
Shabnam Mughal s est presenté au tribunal en angleterre , drappé de noir , de la tete au pieds , refusant les injonctions du juge d enlever le voile pour voir a qui ils avaient affaire , le tribunal a du stopper , maintenant un autre juge devra prendre la decision pour voir si cette dame peut faire son travail dans ce genre d habit ou non ?
Citation
a écrit:
An immigration tribunal had to be stopped after a lawyer twice refused a judge's request that she remove her veil.
Shabnam Mughal appeared at the tribunal dressed head-to-foot in black and wearing a fullface veil with just her eyes showing.
She was representing a Sikh businessman appealing against the Home Office's refusal to grant his nephew permission to visit the UK.
Now another judge, Sir Henry Hodge, head of the Asylum and Immigrations Tribunals, will rule on what should happen next in the case.
At the original hearing tribunal chairman George Glossop asked her to remove the veil during the tribunal hearing in Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire. She refused and the case was adjourned until the afternoon.
When the case was reconvened Judge Glossop said: "I am not very happy that you are appearing in a veil. Would you kindly remove it to assist with communications?
"It will allow me to see your face and I cannot hear you as well as I would like."
Miss Mughal, who is in her twenties, replied: "Sir, we have been through this issue." She then announced: "Sir, I am taking my leave."
She returned to the court as Judge Glossop was talking to Mr Singh. On seeing her enter he asked Miss Mughal: "Do you wish to carry on?" She replied: "No, I just want to listen to what is being said."
Judge Glossop continued: "If you remove your veil, which happens in other courts, we can proceed, otherwise I am going to have consultations with the President of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal. Will you remove it?"
Miss Mughal responded: "You are clearly aware of my position on the grounds of my religious beliefs. I won't."
The dispute follows the case of Muslim teaching assistant Aishah Azmi who was suspended from her job at Headfield Church of England Junior School in Dewsbury, West Yorkshire, after refusing to remove her veil.
[www.dailymail.co.uk]
J ai vu cette info sur un forum anglais , et les membres anglais ont en marre de ce genre de gens qui ne veulent pas suivre les lois anglaise , certains n hesitent pas a dire que si elle n aime pas la loi anglaise , elle n a qu'a quitter le pays .
Citation
Djenine a écrit:Citation
Obs2006 a écrit:
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2006/11/veilAP_228x228.jpg
Shabnam Mughal s est presenté au tribunal en angleterre , drappé de noir , de la tete au pieds , refusant les injonctions du juge d enlever le voile pour voir a qui ils avaient affaire , le tribunal a du stopper , maintenant un autre juge devra prendre la decision pour voir si cette dame peut faire son travail dans ce genre d habit ou non ?
Citation
a écrit:
An immigration tribunal had to be stopped after a lawyer twice refused a judge's request that she remove her veil.
Shabnam Mughal appeared at the tribunal dressed head-to-foot in black and wearing a fullface veil with just her eyes showing.
She was representing a Sikh businessman appealing against the Home Office's refusal to grant his nephew permission to visit the UK.
Now another judge, Sir Henry Hodge, head of the Asylum and Immigrations Tribunals, will rule on what should happen next in the case.
At the original hearing tribunal chairman George Glossop asked her to remove the veil during the tribunal hearing in Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire. She refused and the case was adjourned until the afternoon.
When the case was reconvened Judge Glossop said: "I am not very happy that you are appearing in a veil. Would you kindly remove it to assist with communications?
"It will allow me to see your face and I cannot hear you as well as I would like."
Miss Mughal, who is in her twenties, replied: "Sir, we have been through this issue." She then announced: "Sir, I am taking my leave."
She returned to the court as Judge Glossop was talking to Mr Singh. On seeing her enter he asked Miss Mughal: "Do you wish to carry on?" She replied: "No, I just want to listen to what is being said."
Judge Glossop continued: "If you remove your veil, which happens in other courts, we can proceed, otherwise I am going to have consultations with the President of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal. Will you remove it?"
Miss Mughal responded: "You are clearly aware of my position on the grounds of my religious beliefs. I won't."
The dispute follows the case of Muslim teaching assistant Aishah Azmi who was suspended from her job at Headfield Church of England Junior School in Dewsbury, West Yorkshire, after refusing to remove her veil.
[www.dailymail.co.uk]
J ai vu cette info sur un forum anglais , et les membres anglais ont en marre de ce genre de gens qui ne veulent pas suivre les lois anglaise , certains n hesitent pas a dire que si elle n aime pas la loi anglaise , elle n a qu'a quitter le pays .
Cette tenue est une manière d'affirmer sa présomption d'innocence.
...c'est quoi la présomption d'innocence Djenine?Citation
Obs2006 a écrit:Citation
Isfahan a écrit:
Mdrrrrrrrr!
c est a dire celles qui ne s habillent pas de cette maniere , elles ne sont pas innocente ?
Citation
andi espoir a écrit:Citation
Bass a écrit:
Salam aalikoum
Obs2006 alias jean pierre pernot
En effet, je crois qu' Obs2006 est un islamophobes, ses posts ne concernent que la critique négative de l'Islam. Avez-vous des critiques positives, monsieur Obs2006 ou êtes-vous tout simplement un athée ?
Citation
Obs2006 a écrit:Citation
comeback a écrit:
tu l'as dis
il faut essayer d'ameliorer notre quotidien de nous meme.
madame l'avocat ne demande rien a personne.
madame l avocat ne vit pas en arabie seoudite , elle doit respecter les lois en vigueur du pays europeen .
Citation
Obs2006 a écrit:Citation
comeback a écrit:
tu l'as dis
il faut essayer d'ameliorer notre quotidien de nous meme.
madame l'avocat ne demande rien a personne.
madame l avocat ne vit pas en arabie seoudite , elle doit respecter les lois en vigueur du pays europeen .
Citation
comeback a écrit:Citation
Obs2006 a écrit:Citation
comeback a écrit:
tu l'as dis
il faut essayer d'ameliorer notre quotidien de nous meme.
madame l'avocat ne demande rien a personne.
madame l avocat ne vit pas en arabie seoudite , elle doit respecter les lois en vigueur du pays europeen .
elle a transgressé quelleS loiS?
Citation
Obs2006 a écrit:Citation
comeback a écrit:Citation
Obs2006 a écrit:Citation
comeback a écrit:
tu l'as dis
il faut essayer d'ameliorer notre quotidien de nous meme.
madame l'avocat ne demande rien a personne.
madame l avocat ne vit pas en arabie seoudite , elle doit respecter les lois en vigueur du pays europeen .
elle a transgressé quelleS loiS?
les lois de la cour anglaise , de la magistrature , et du tribunal anglais en general .
Il y a une certaine conduite a suivre , tu n aimes pas cette conduite , tu suis le cours administratifs qui te donne le droit de porter plainte ou demander a ce que la loi puisse etre modifier , imagine toi demain , un homme europeen ne respecte pas les lois en vigeur dans un pays musulman , tu crois qu il va etre le bienvenu ?
Citation
Obs2006 a écrit:Citation
comeback a écrit:Citation
Obs2006 a écrit:Citation
comeback a écrit:
tu l'as dis
il faut essayer d'ameliorer notre quotidien de nous meme.
madame l'avocat ne demande rien a personne.
madame l avocat ne vit pas en arabie seoudite , elle doit respecter les lois en vigueur du pays europeen .
elle a transgressé quelleS loiS?
les lois de la cour anglaise , de la magistrature , et du tribunal anglais en general .
Il y a une certaine conduite a suivre , tu n aimes pas cette conduite , tu suis le cours administratifs qui te donne le droit de porter plainte ou demander a ce que la loi puisse etre modifier , imagine toi demain , un homme europeen ne respecte pas les lois en vigeur dans un pays musulman , tu crois qu il va etre le bienvenu ?
chargement...
.
+ 
